.
SOME SUGGESTION FOR
SUCCESSFUL REVISING
Offered
here are some suggestions aimed at making your revising stage as effective as
possible. These suggestion are based on yours of writing experience, but they
are only suggestion. Not ironclad rules.
Suggestion
1: Give Yourself Some Breathing Space
After
you have finished you first draft. Give yourself some time,at least 24
hours before you begin the revising process . This “breathing Space” gives you some distance from your work. Which
you will need to order to review it
objectively. And it gives your unconscious an opportunity to over the
material. So that when you return to the argument.you’ll find you have fresh
ideas about how to make it more effective. You have probably had the experience of
rereading a graded paper and wondering how you could have missed the problems
that seem so obvious to you now. Putting some distance between first draft and
the revision gives you and opportunity to gain this fresh perspective, and to
put it to use before you paper is
graded
Suggestion
2 : Avoid the Red Pen
As
you’ve reviewing your first draft, avoid the lure of the red pen or typing in
any changes if you are reading from the screen-the temptation to make small
editorial changes before you had reread and the argument as a
whole. Reread with your hands tied behind your back(figuratively, that is), and
you will get a much better sense of how the draft works as a whole.
Suggestion
3: Review Your Original Purpose and Audience
In
writing the first draft, you have been intent on coming up with the right word
and composing individual sentences. It’s easy at this level to lose touch with
your original purposes and intended audience. So an important question to ask
yourself as you’re reading revising is whether you have fulfilled you original
intended audience.
It can be helpful to review your argument
pretending that you’re one of its intended readers. From this perspective, you
can ask yourself: do I understand the purposes and claim of this argument? Are
the vocabulary and specialized terms clear to me? Am I convinced by the
argument?
Suggestion
4: Review Your Organization
In
reviewing the effectiveness of your argument, you’ll need to consider not only
your purposes and audience, but also the overall organization of what you’ve
written, making sure that the parts fir together well and are logically
sequenced, that nothing curcial is ommited, and the structure is lean, with a
minimum of repetition. If it’s hard to keep the organization in mind, try
reproducimg it I outline forms, as in the following model. Remember, you’re
outlining what you actually wrote, not what you intended to write. If you
actually wrote your draft from outline. Don‘t look at it until you have
completed this new one.
I.
Introduction (I if
appropriate)
II.
Claim(if appropiate)
III.
Supossing arguments
A
B
C
D
B
C
D
IV
conclusion or summary (if appropriate)
If
you have troble constructing this new outline, your argument probably has
organizational problems that need attention.
Seggestion
5: Review Your Argument’s Coherence
Even
the most carefully organized argument will puzzle readers readers if the
relationship between the part is nit indicated in some way. In certain
professions and busineses, standard format include headings like “
introduction,” “ the problem,” “history,” and so on. But such heading are
inappropriaate in msany things. You can make the elements of your argument coherent- estabilish their
relationship to one aother and to the whole—by using simple transitional words
and expressions that indicate the nature of the relationship.
Word
like therefore, thus, soand consequently
identify a conclusion and it’s convidence. Words like but, however, and the other hand indicate exception to a stated point
.yu can alert your reader to the introduction of each new piece of support by
using indicators such as these
are enormously useful to readesof argumrnts.particularly when the argument is
long or elaborate. They helps readers understand how one statement or section
that may otherwise seem a digression or an irrelevancy relates to what has gone
efore or what might come later.
Seggestion
6 : Review Your Trying
The
revising stages is the tome to consider yhe effectiveness of your argument’s
style: its tone, word choice, amd general treatment of the readrs. Style is
acrucial component of argument, often playing a major role in convincingnor
alienting readers. Poor style is just as damaging to an argument as a vague or
unspported claim; an affective style is just as convising as compilling
evidence. And while you’re considering your style, think about the othes
projected by your argument: does the argument reflect the writers who is fair,
open-minded., and oppropriately confidenct?
Check
your draft to see if you have (1) used connotation effectively, (2) avoided
slanting, (3) used methaphor and analogy effectively and (4) paid attention to
the sounds of words. Some of these question will naturally occur during you
consideration of claim on the organization of its support, as well as during
your review of audience and purposes.
Suggestion7:
Review your Argument for Faulty Reasoning
Chapter
5 introduced some basic principles of logic that will help you set up a
reasonable argument. The “informal fallacies” presented there are most easly
detected during the revision stage. As a final step in reviewing your argument,
read it thruoght or detected any unwitting fallacies, paayong special attention
ti those that are particalarly common in the kind of argument you’ve written.
Suggestion
8: Use a Word Processor
Fortunately
(some student would say unfortunenately), revising may lead to a drastic
overhaul of your argment. But if you want your argument to be as good it can
be, you won’t ignore the opportunity to make these major changes.Most student
noe writers their papers on computers, which make large- and small-scale
revising much easier than any other method. If you’re one of those few people
who have resisted the move the computers, we strongly urge you to make the
change. With a computer and a good-processing program, you can swith entire
sections of a dreft around with ease; change word swiftly and even “globally”
so that one word replaces another throughout an entire essay;and make
corrections with no trace of erasures or correction fluid. Virtually all
campuses have computer labs for their students, which save the expence of
purchasing your own computers. And while a computer will not make you a better
writer,it will give tou the chance to make yourself a better writers so get
wired.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar